Publications
-
Lowe AE, Kraft C, Kortepeter MG, Hansen KF, Sanger K, Johnson A, Grein JD, Martin J, Rousselle R, Garland JA, Spotts J, Lowe JJ, Sauer LM, Kratochvil CJ, Gordon BG. Developing a Rapid Response Single IRB Model for Conducting Research During a Public Health Emergency. Health Secur. 2022 Jun;20(S1):S60-S70. doi: 10.1089/hs.2021.0181. Epub 2022 May 11. PMID: 35544310.
-
Anderson EE, Johnson A, Lynch HF. Inclusive, engaged, and accountable institutional review boards. Account Res. 2023 Jun 5:1-9. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2220884. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37272596.
-
Anderson, E. E., Hurley, E. A., Serpico, K., Johnson, A., Rowe, J., Singleton, M., Bierer, B. E., Cholka, B., Chaudhari, S., & Fernandez Lynch, H. (2022). Engaging key stakeholders to overcome barriers to studying the quality of research ethics oversight. Research Ethics, 0(0).
-
Johnson AR, Nadkarni NM, Weber CQ. Providing Public Engagement Training to Build Connections Between the Community and Research Ethics Professionals: A Pilot Project. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2022;17(5):545- 553. doi:10.1177/15562646221126282.
- Burr, J.S., Johnson, A., Risenmay, A., Bisping, S., Serdoz, E.S., Coleman, W., Sward, K.A., Rothwell, E. and Dean, J.M.
(2022), Demonstration Project: Transitioning a Research Network to New Single IRB
Platforms. Ethics & Human Research, 44: 32-38.https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500149
- A.R. Johnson, M. Pautler, J.S. Burr, N. Abdelsamad, J.M. VanBuren, L.M. Rigtrup, J.M. Dean, E. Rothwell, Using single IRB consultations to meet the educational needs of investigative teams, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100971.
- Johnson, A. (2021). Shaken. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, 11(1), 82-84. https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2021.0032
- Johnson, A.,Rigtrup, L., VanBuren, J., Rothwell, R., Dean, JM. (2021). An Approach to Reviewing Local Context for Exception from Informed Consent Trials
Using a Single IRB. Ethics & Human Research, Nov;43(6):42-48. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500109.
- Malone Jenkins, S. Palmquist, R. Kapron, A. Torr, C. Best, D. Karren, M. Brunelli,
L. Yandell, M. Tristani-Firouzi, M. Dimmock, D. Watts, B. Botkin, J. Johnson, A. Bonkowsky, J. (2021). Addressing Ethical and Laboratory Challenges for Initiation of a Rapid Whole Genome
Sequencing Program. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Volume 5, Issue 1, 2021, e177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.833.
- Ford, D., Johnson, A., Nichols, J., Rothwell, E., Dubinett, S., & Naeim, A. (2021). Challenges and lessons learned for institutional review board procedures during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1), E107. doi:10.1017/cts.2021.27
- Johnson, A, Kasimatis Singleton, M. (2021). “Responsibilities of the Reviewing IRB,” in Institutional Review Board: Management and Function, eds. Bankert, EA. Gordon, BG. Hurley, EA. (Jones & Bartlett Learning).
- Burr, J.S., Johnson, A.R., Vasenina, V., Bisping, S., Coleman, R.W., Botkin, J.R. and Dean, J.M. (2019), Implementing a Central IRB Model in a Multicenter Research Network. Ethics & Human Research, 41: 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500016
Posters
A Community Advisory IRB Panel: Amplifying Voices & Improving the Review of Human Subject Research
Implementation of a Community Advisory IRB panel is a unique way to increase community member participation. Our concept of a CA-IRB panel goes beyond the traditional concepts of community IRB member service and a community advisory board; it gives a convened IRB's voting majority to non-scientist, community members, allowing their perspectives to be more readily considered and moves their perspectives beyond a mere advisory role.
Presented: 2022 PRIM&R Annual Conference
Audio Short Forms: Improving the Consent Process for Non-English Speaking Participants
By creating an audio library of our short form consent document, we hoped to remove the language barrier that currently exists for non-English speaking, illiterate, or visually impaired populations in our community.
Presented: 2019 PRIM&R AER Conference
Moving Beyond Informed Consent Templates: An Interactive, Guided Approach for Investigators
The purpose of this project was to develop an alternative method for assisting investigators in writing a consent document instead of the traditional informed consent template.
Presented: 2019 AAHRPP Conference, 2019 PRIM&R AER Conference
A Standardized Model for Recording & Reporting Institutional Review Board Metrics
IRBs are under the microscope for review efficiency. However, comparison of metrics across IRBs can be ineffective due to the variations in IRB procedures and review processes. There is increased urgency to develop a standard approach for recording and reporting IRB metrics.
Presented: 2019 PRIM&R AER Conference
An Approach to Reviewing Local Context for Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) Trials Using Single IRB
We created a specific local context submission and review process when acting as the Single IRB for EFIC trials.
Presented: 2019 PRIM&R AER Conference